• R D Sanders, C Graham, S C Lewis, A Bodenham, M J Gough, C Warlow, and GALA Trial Investigators.
• Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. robert.sanders@imperial.ac.uk
• Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep 1; 109 (3): 361367361-7.

BackgroundNitrous oxide has been associated with increased vascular risk in the perioperative period. Here, we conducted a secondary analysis of the GALA trial to ascertain the impact of nitrous oxide on outcomes after carotid surgery under general anaesthesia (GA).MethodsOne thousand seven hundred and seventy-three patients underwent GA, but 158 patients were excluded from this analysis as nitrous oxide use was unknown. The decision to use nitrous oxide was at the discretion of the anaesthetist and was not randomized. Six hundred and seventy-one patients received nitrous oxide and 944 patients did not. Logistic regression was used to analyse the same primary outcome as the original trial (risk of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction within 30 days of the operation).ResultsPatients who received nitrous oxide were more likely to have had coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation (all P<0.05). Overall, there were 35 (5.2%) primary outcome events in patients receiving nitrous oxide compared with 44 (4.7%) in those who did not [relative risk 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI: 0.73, 1.73); P=0.63]. The adjustment for the imbalanced baseline variables using logistic regression reduced the point estimate of harm for nitrous oxide [adjusted odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI (0.68, 1.74); P=0.73].ConclusionsGiven the greater prevalence of vascular risk factors in the nitrous oxide group and the lack of any definite effect on the primary outcome measure, these data do not support a clinically meaningful adverse effect of nitrous oxide on our composite outcome in patients undergoing carotid surgery.

19 keywords...

hide…