• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Sep 2002

    Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: are there alternatives to randomized clinical trials?

    • John Whyte.
    • Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, and the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jwhyte@einstein.edu
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Sep 1; 83 (9): 1320-2.

    AbstractRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) are widely considered to be the gold standard of evidence for treatment efficacy, but they have not been widely applied to rehabilitation or, more specifically, traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Ethical, scientific, and resource factors may limit the application of RCTs. Thus, rigorous observational alternatives to the RCT would be of great value. In the article by Powell et al, an attempt to rigorously apply an observational design to assess the relative effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation versus home discharge failed to control for important confounding factors. It appears nearly impossible to successfully apply observational designs when the factors leading to the applications of different treatments are strongly related to the patient's perceived prognosis. However, observational designs may be successfully applied when regional or temporal variations in care are studied. Moreover, a number of developments in measurement, study design, and statistical analysis may expand the role of observational studies in answering questions of rehabilitation efficacy and effectiveness.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…