• Benjamin G Druss, Manasvini Singh, Silke A von Esenwein, Gretl E Glick, Stephanie Tapscott, Sherry Jenkins Tucker, Cathy A Lally, and Evelina W Sterling.
• Dr. Druss, Ms. Singh, Dr. von Esenwein, Ms. Tapscott, and Ms. Lally are with the Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Atlanta. Ms. Glick is with J. Michael Consulting, Atlanta. Ms. Tucker is with the Georgia Mental Health Consumer Network, Atlanta. Dr. Sterling is with the Department of Sociology, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia.
• Psychiatr Serv. 2018 May 1; 69 (5): 529-535.

ObjectiveIndividuals with serious mental illnesses have high rates of general medical comorbidity and challenges in managing these conditions. A growing workforce of certified peer specialists is available to help these individuals more effectively manage their health and health care. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of peer-led programs for self-management of general medical conditions for this population.MethodsThis randomized study enrolled 400 participants with a serious mental illness and one or more chronic general medical conditions across three community mental health clinics. Participants were randomly assigned to the Health and Recovery Peer (HARP) program, a self-management program for general medical conditions led by certified peer specialists (N=198), or to usual care (N=202). Assessments were conducted at baseline and three and six months.ResultsAt six months, participants in the intervention group demonstrated a significant differential improvement in the primary study outcome, health-related quality of life. Specifically, compared with the usual care group, intervention participants had greater improvement in the Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary (an increase of 2.7 versus 1.4 points, p=.046) and mental component summary (4.6 versus 2.5 points, p=.039). Significantly greater six-month improvements in mental health recovery were seen for the intervention group (p=.02), but no other between-group differences in secondary outcome measures were significant.ConclusionsThe HARP program was associated with improved physical health- and mental health-related quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness and comorbid general medical conditions, suggesting the potential benefits of more widespread dissemination of peer-led disease self-management in this population.

19 keywords...

hide…