• Yueh-Ling Hsieh, Li-Wei Chou, Yie-San Joe, and Chang-Zern Hong.
• Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Science, Taichung, Taiwan.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jul 1; 92 (7): 1098-105.

ObjectiveTo elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying the remote effects produced by dry needling rabbit skeletal muscle myofascial trigger spots (MTrSs) via analyses of their endplate noise (EPN) recordings.DesignExperimental animal controlled trial.SettingAn animal laboratory of a university.AnimalsMale New Zealand rabbits (N=96) (body weight, 2.5-3.0kg; age, 16-20wk).InterventionAnimals received no intervention for neural interruption in group I, transection of the tibial nerve in group II, transection of L5 and L6 spinal cord in group III, and transection of the T1 and T2 spinal cord in group IV. Each group was further divided into 4 subgroups: animals received ipsilateral dry needling, contralateral dry needling, ipsilateral sham needling, or contralateral sham needling of gastrocnemius MTrSs.Main Outcome MeasuresEPN amplitudes of biceps femoris (BF) MTrSs.ResultsBF MTrS mean EPN amplitudes significantly increased (P<.05) initially after gastrocnemius verum needling but reduced to a level significantly lower (P<.05) than the preneedling level in groups I and IV with ipsilateral dry needling or contralateral dry needling, and in group II with contralateral dry needling (but not ipsilateral dry needling). No significant EPN amplitude changes were observed in BF MTrS in group III or in the control animals receiving superficial needling (sham).ConclusionThis remote effect of dry needling depends on an intact afferent pathway from the stimulating site to the spinal cord and a normal spinal cord function at the levels corresponding to the innervation of the proximally affected muscle.Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…