• Bhaswati Roy, Rakesh K Gupta, Andrew A Maudsley, Rishi Awasthi, Sulaiman Sheriff, Meng Gu, Nuzhat Husain, Sudipta Mohakud, Sanjay Behari, Chandra M Pandey, Ram K S Rathore, Daniel M Spielman, and Jeffry R Alger.
• Department of Radiology & Imaging, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India 122002.
• Neuroradiology. 2013 May 1; 55 (5): 603-13.

IntroductionAccurate grading of cerebral glioma using conventional structural imaging techniques remains challenging due to the relatively poor sensitivity and specificity of these methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative sensitivity and specificity of structural magnetic resonance imaging and MR measurements of perfusion, diffusion, and whole-brain spectroscopic parameters for glioma grading.MethodsFifty-six patients with radiologically suspected untreated glioma were studied with T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and volumetric whole-brain MR spectroscopic imaging. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed using the relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), apparent diffusion coefficient, fractional anisotropy, and multiple spectroscopic parameters to determine optimum thresholds for tumor grading and to obtain the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for identifying high-grade gliomas. Logistic regression was performed to analyze all the parameters together.ResultsThe rCBV individually classified glioma as low and high grade with a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 88 %, respectively, based on a threshold value of 3.34. On combining all parameters under consideration, the classification was achieved with 2 % error and sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 96 %, respectively.ConclusionIndividually, CBV measurement provides the greatest diagnostic performance for predicting glioma grade; however, the most accurate classification can be achieved by combining all of the imaging parameters.

23 keywords...

hide…