• Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao · Nov 2018

    [Prognostic value of difference between peripheral venous and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in patients with septic shock: a pilot study].

    • Wei Gao, Yong Zhang, Haibin Ni, Jialiu Zhang, Dandan Zhou, Liping Yin, Feng Zhang, Hao Chen, Beibei Zhang, and Wei Li.
    • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, China.
    • Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Nov 30; 38 (11): 1312-1317.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the prognostic value of the difference between peripheral venous and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide in patients with septic shock following early resuscitation.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted among the patients with septic shock treated in our department during the period from May, 2017 to May, 2018. Peripheral venous, peripheral arterial and central venous blood samples were collected simultaneously and analyzed immediately at bedside after 6-h bundle treatment. Arterial blood lactate concentration (Lac) and the arterial (PaCO2), peripheral venous (PpvCO2) and central venous partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PcvCO2) were recorded. The differences between PpvCO2 and PaCO2 (Ppv-aCO2) and between PcvCO2 and PaCO2 (Pcv-aCO2) were calculated. Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the agreement between Pcv-aCO2 and Ppv-aCO2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the possible risk factors for 28-day mortality, and the receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) was plotted to assess the prognostic values of these factors for 28-day mortality.ResultsA total of 62 patients were enrolled in this study, among who 35 survived and 27 died during the 28-day period. Compared with the survivor group, the patients died within 28 days showed significantly higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation Ⅱ (APACHE Ⅱ) score (24.2±6.0 vs 20.5±4.9, P=0.011), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (14.9±4.7 vs 12.2±4.5, P=0.027), PcvaCO2 (5.5±1.6 vs 7.1±1.7, P < 0.001), PpvaCO2 (7.1±1.8 vs 10.0±2.7, P < 0.001), and arterial lactate level (3.3±1.2 vs 4.2±1.3, P=0.003) after 6-h bundle treatment. Pearson correlation analysis showed that Ppv-aCO2 was significantly correlated with Pcv-aCO2 (r=0.897, R2= 0.805, P < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified Ppv-aCO2 (β=0.625, P=0.001, OR=1.869, 95% CI: 1.311-2.664) and lactate level (β=0.584, P=0.041, OR=1.794, 95%CI: 1.024-3.415) as the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. The maximum area under the ROC (AUC) of Ppv-aCO2 was 0.814 (95%CI: 0.696- 0.931, P < 0.001), and at the best cut- off value of 9.05 mmHg, Ppv-aCO2 had a sensitivity of 70.4% and a specificity of 88.6% for predicting 28-day mortality. The AUC of lactate level was 0.732 (95%CI: 0.607-0.858, P=0.002), and its sensitivity for predicting 28-day mortality was 70.4% and the specificity was 74.3% at the best cut-off value of 3.45 mmol/L; The AUC of Pcv-aCO2 was 0.766 (95%CI: 0.642-0.891, P < 0.001), and its sensitivity was 66.7% and the specificity was 80.0% at the best cut-off value of 7.05 mmHg.ConclusionsA high Ppv-aCO2 after early resuscitation of septic shock is associated with poor outcomes. Ppv-aCO2 is well correlated with Pcv-aCO2 and can be used as an independent indicator for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…