• J Jackson.
• Department of International Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, UK.
• Parassitologia. 1998 Jun 1; 40 (1-2): 193-216.

AbstractWhen making a decision involves the analysis of complex cause-effect relationships, experts are normally consulted to describe the best options available. The global Malaria Eradication Programme relied upon the advice of a small group of experienced malariologists; their counsel directed the most ambitious endeavour in the history of the World Health Organisation. In this essay 1 week to show how that group behaved with a single purpose and ultimately grew to be greater than the sum of its parts because of the control of knowledge. Each member of this epistemic community was willing to battle against malaria as soon as possible--forsaking research, traditional tools, and risking disastrous epidemics--because they believed that residual insecticides could progressively eradicate a disease that killed millions and sapped the lives of countless more. Alternative methods were ridiculed; and the epistemic community used their individual prestige to insert the DDT gospel into the technical forums of the WHO, and the power (and money) forums of the USA. Particular knowledge structures of the post-war decade nurtured a technical solution to malaria, and we shall explore how the WHO and the epistemic community could grow within this environment so compatible to their praxes.

13 keywords...

hide…