• Presse Med · Sep 2004

    [Assessment of out-patient treatment of varicella in children].

    • F Dubos, H Bovet Langlois-Meurinne, V Hue, A Martinot, and Réseau inter-hospitalier d'évaluation des pratiques médicales dans les affections courantes de l'enfant.
    • Clinique de pédiatrie, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU Lille.
    • Presse Med. 2004 Sep 11;33(15):992-6.

    BackgroundVaricella, an almost compulsory affection in children, is complicated in 2% of cases. Some treatments such as powders and non-steroidial anti-inflammatories (NSAIs) may favorise or worsen infectious complications.ObjectiveTo assess out-patient prescriptions in children presenting with varicella.MethodsThree methods were used. Collection of the out-patient prescriptions in children (n=122) subsequently presenting with varicella in one of the hospitals in the North of France conducted from January to May 2003. A telephone survey was made among 50 general practitioners in the same area in March 2003. This collected not only the prescription of the last case reported, but also the intended prescriptions when confronted with a simulated case of the disease.ResultsPowders were prescribed in 44 to 54% of cases, NSAIs in 14 to 16%, aspirin in 2 to 4%, and oral acyclovir in 4%. The three assessment methods did not reveal any differences in the prescription of antibiotics, more frequent in the children subsequently visiting the hospital (25 vs. 6%), and the prescriptions of paracetamol. Only 38% of the prescriptions during clinical cases corresponded to the guidelines.ConclusionIt is crucial that practitioners be informed on the treatment of varicella and the risks of severe cutaneous surinfections enhanced by certain prescriptions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…