• Xijing Wang, Zhansheng Chen, G KrumhuberEvaEDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, UK., and Hao Chen.
• Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
• Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct 1; 60 (4): 1262-1278.

AbstractPrevious research on money and prosociality has described a monotonic pattern, showing that money reduces generosity. The present research aimed to examine whether money differently impairs generosity when arising from altruistic versus egoistic motives. To this end, we employed economic games designed to study generosity (e.g., the Dictator game) and varied experimental currency (i.e., money vs. candy/food). The results (N = 850) showed that although money made people ignore others when others were not crucial for their future gain, generosity was not impacted when egoistic motives (Study 1: avoiding sanctions; Studies 2 and 3: building reputation) were present. In other words, although people in general showed flexible prosociality by adjusting their generosity level according to game type, this was much more strongly the case when money rather than candy/food was the currency. In addition, we demonstrate a boundary condition of money on flexible generosity, namely imbuing money with prosocial meaning (Study 3). Some implications are discussed.© 2021 The British Psychological Society.

7 keywords...

hide…