• Eur. J. Pediatr. · May 2018

    Review Meta Analysis

    The diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis.

    • Ioannis Bellos, Georgia Fitrou, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Nikolaos Thomakos, Despina N Perrea, and Georgios Daskalakis.
    • Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Surgical Research N.S. Christeas, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
    • Eur. J. Pediatr. 2018 May 1; 177 (5): 625-632.

    AbstractThere is growing evidence that presepsin is a promising biomarker in the diagnosis of sepsis in adults. The objective of our study is to investigate current evidence related to the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis. To accomplish this, we searched the Medline (1966-2017), Scopus (2004-2017), Clinicaltrials.gov (2008-2017), EMBASE (1980-2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL (1999-2017), and Google Scholar (2004-2017) databases. Eleven studies were included in the present meta-analysis, with a total number of 783 neonates. The pooled sensitivity of serum presepsin for the prediction of neonatal sepsis was 0.91 (95% CI [0.87-0.93]) and the pooled specificity was 0.91 (95% CI [0.88-0.94]). The diagnostic odds ratio was 170.28 (95% CI [51.13-567.11]) and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.9751 (SE 0.0117). Head-to-head comparison with AUC values of C-reactive protein (0.9748 vs. 0.8580) and procalcitonin (0.9596 vs. 0.7831) revealed that presepsin was more sensitive in detecting neonatal sepsis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.