• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Nov 1999

    Comparative Study

    Quality assessment in minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting.

    • A Diegeler, M Matin, V Falk, C Binner, T Walther, R Autschbach, and F W Mohr.
    • University of Leipzig, Heartcenter, Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, Germany. diea@server3.medizin.uni-leipzig.de
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov 1; 16 Suppl 2: S67-72.

    ObjectivesThe most important determinant for the success of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) is the quality and long-term patency of the graft and anastomosis. Intra and postoperative quality assessment is important to confirm the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive techniques.MethodsFrom January to December 1998 MIDCAB was performed in 246 patients using a limited minithoracotomy for single left anterior descending artery (LAD) revascularization. According to our standard protocol quality assessment of the graft and anastomosis consisted of intraoperative flow measurement, early postoperative angiography and follow-up angiography after 6 months.ResultsIntraoperative flow measurement was performed in patients with anastomoses unsuitable for coronary probing (75/246, mean flow of 34.3 +/- 17.7 ml/min). Early patency was confirmed by intraoperative monoplane angiogram in 37/246 (15.0%) patients and by postoperative multiplan angiography in 205/246 (83.3%). Early patency rate was 98.0%. Six months follow-up showed a patency rate of 97.5% (one occluded graft, two severe and two moderate stenoses at the anastomotic site). Eighty-nine percent of the patients were in a CCS angina class I, 11% in class II, respectively. Six months mortality was 0.8%. Re-intervention had to be performed in 5/116 (4.3%).ConclusionsA standardized protocol for quality assessment is mandatory for MIDCAB surgery. The proposed algorithm serves to ensure the safety and effectiveness of this new technique. Our recent series document an excellent outcome of the MIDCAB approach. Postoperative multiplan angiography is the only technique to achieve valid information about the quality of graft and anastomosis.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…