-
Proc Inst Mech Eng H · Jan 2010
Robotics can lead to a reproducibly high-quality operative result for ear, nose, and throat patients.
- C J Coulson, A P Reid, and D W Proops.
- ENT Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. chriscoulson@doctors.org.uk
- Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010 Jan 1;224(6):735-42.
AbstractThe success rates and morbidity of operations on the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) have improved markedly in the last 20-25 years. This has been largely due to improved vision, by microscopes and endoscopes, and has led to a greatly reduced hospital stay. During this time there has been minimal improvement in surgical tools. This paper discusses the need for robotic tools, detailing the clinical constraints that proposed solutions need to adhere to, and presenting a recently trialled micro drilling robot for creating a cochleostomy in the cochlear implant procedure.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..