-
- Kaizhen Liu, Long Chen, Jing Xiong, Shuqin Xie, Yuan Hu, and Yuan Shi.
- Department of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University; National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders; Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders; Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
- Eur. J. Pediatr. 2021 Jul 1; 180 (7): 2155-2164.
AbstractThis study aimed to evaluate whether high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) could reduce mortality and the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) of perinatal-onset neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Medical records were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Among the 700 neonates with NARDS who needed invasive ventilation, 501 (71.6%) received CMV, while 199 (28.4%) received HFOV. One-to-one propensity score matching (127:127) was used to match the baseline characteristics of patients who received CMV and HFOV. The results showed that birth weight and oxygenation index (OI) were independently associated with mortality in the multivariate logistic regression. No significant differences were observed in mortality or the incidence of BPD between the two groups. The incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and ventilation-free days were significantly lower in the HFOV group than in the CMV group (3.9 vs 11.80%, p=0.02; 15.226 vs 20.967 days, p=0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding other secondary outcomes.Conclusion: HFOV was associated with a decreased incidence of IVH in infants with NARDS compared with CMV. However, there were significantly more VFDs in the CMV group than in the HFOV group, and HFOV did not appear to be superior to CMV in decreasing the mortality and incidence of BPD in infants with NARDS. What is Known: • The diagnostic criteria of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (Montreux criteria) were established in 2017. • To date, studies comparing high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in the treatment of neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome are insufficient. What is New: • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation did not appear to be superior to conventional mechanical ventilation in decreasing the mortality and incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with moderate-to-severe perinatal-onset neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome. • High-frequency oscillatory ventilation was associated with a decreased incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage in infants with moderate-to-severe perinatal-onset acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with conventional mechanical ventilation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.