• Annals of surgery · Nov 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Open Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair, TREPP versus TIPP in a Randomized Clinical Trial: Abstract provisionally accepted for ESA congress May 2021 Cologne, titled 'Chronic inguinal pain after the TransREctus sheath preperitoneal method compared to the TransInguinal preperitoneal technique. A randomized clinical trial'.

    • BökkerinkWillem J VWJVDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands., Giel G Koning, VriensPatrick W H EPWHEDepartment of Surgery, Elisabeth Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands., MollenRoland M H GRMHGDepartment of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands., Mitchell J R Harker, Robin K Noordhof, Willem L Akkersdijk, and van LaarhovenCees J H MCJHMDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands..
    • Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
    • Ann. Surg. 2021 Nov 1; 274 (5): 698704698-704.

    ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) in patients with an inguinal hernia after the TransREctus Sheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) and the TransInguinal PrePeritoneal Technique (TIPP).BackgroundThe preperitoneal mesh position for inguinal hernia repair showed beneficial results regarding CPIP with low recurrence rates. Two open preperitoneal techniques, TREPP and TIPP, were compared in a randomized clinical trial with the hypothesis of fewer patients with CPIP after TREPP due to complete avoidance of nerve contact.MethodsAdult patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to either TREPP or TIPP in four hospitals. Before the trial's start the study protocol was ethically approved and published. Outcomes included CPIP after 1 year (primary outcome) and recurrence rates, adverse events, and health-related quality of life (secondary outcomes). Follow-up was performed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year.ResultsBaseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. Pain was less often present after TREPP at 2 weeks and 6 months, but CPIP at rest at 1 year was comparable: 1.9% after TREPP vs 1.4% after TIPP, P = 0.535). The overall recurrence rate was higher in the TREPP group, 8.9% vs 4.6%, P = 0.022). Corrected for a learning curve for TREPP, no significant difference could be assessed (TREPP 5.7% and TIPP 4.8%, P = 0.591).ConclusionBoth the TREPP and TIPP technique resulted in a low incidence of CPIP after 1-year follow-up. The TREPP method can be considered a solid method for inguinal hernia repair if expertise is present. The learning curve of the TREPP techniques needs further evaluation.Trial RegistrationISRCTN18591339.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.