-
Scand. J. Gastroenterol. · Jan 2016
Clinical importance of faecal calprotectin variability in inflammatory bowel disease: intra-individual variability and standardisation of sampling procedure.
- Vendel Kristensen, Gunn Helen Malmstrøm, Viggo Skar, Arne Røseth, and Bjørn Moum.
- a Department of Medicine , Unger-Vetlesen's Institute, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital , Oslo , Norway ;
- Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan 1; 51 (5): 548-55.
ObjectiveFaecal (f-) calprotectin is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation. Previous studies have described intra-individual day-to-day variability of this biomarker in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and morning samples have been suggested for standardisation purposes. With this project, we investigated if day-to-day variability differed from diurnal variability. Additionally, we evaluated a new extraction method for f-calprotectin analysis.MethodsFifty patients provided three faeces samples from morning - evening - morning on two consecutive days. Nineteen patients provided two faeces samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional spot sample, and one sample with a device for patient-administered sampling and extraction.ResultsThe two morning samples differentiated between mucosal inflammation and mucosal healing with same level of agreement as the two samples from the same day (kappa 0.76), using an f-calprotectin cut-off level of 259 μg/g. Although large intra-individual variation in f-calprotectin values, there were no significant day-to-day (p = 0.096) or diurnal variation (p = 0.78). Used by laboratory technicians, the new extraction device correlated significantly with the conventional extraction method (p < 0.001), Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.95. Of the 19 patients testing patient administered extraction, two patients provided samples leading to considerably higher f-calprotectin levels than conventional sampling procedure.ConclusionsThe reliability of f-calprotectin morning samples is equal to the reliability of samples from different bowel movements on the same day. The new extraction method is reliable when used by laboratory technicians, but larger studies are recommended to evaluate patient administered extraction.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.