• Chun Ruan, Scott H Yang, Kenneth Cusi, Feng Gao, and Geoffrey D Clarke.
• Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78284-6200, USA.
• Invest Radiol. 2007 Jun 1; 42 (6): 352-60.

ObjectiveMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 T is significantly different than 1.5 T and needs to be optimized due to increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and specific absorption ratio (SAR). This study tests the hypothesis that first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI using saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP with parallel imaging is superior to SR-TurboFLASH and a more achievable technique for clinical application at 3 T.Materials And MethodsMyocardial perfusion imaging was performed on 12 subjects using SR-TurboFLASH and SR-TrueFISP sequences combined with parallel imaging. Four myocardial slices were acquired and evaluated by image segmentation. Quality of the measurements was determined from SNR, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), enhancement-to-noise ratio (ENR), and myocardial perfusion upslope. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA with imaging method and segment number as the independent variables.ResultsSNR, CNR, ENR, and upslope were significantly higher for SR-TrueFISP versus SR-TurboFLASH (P < 0.001). Significant differences in SNR, CNR, ENR, and upslope were found among the myocardial segments (P < 0.005).ConclusionsOptimized SR-TrueFISP first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI at 3 T has superior image quality compared with SR-TurboFLASH, independent of the myocardial segment analyzed. However, coil sensitivity nonuniformities and dielectric resonance effects cause signal intensity differences between myocardial segments that must be accounted for when interpreting 3 T perfusion studies.

16 keywords...

hide…