• Qing-Bin Wu, Xiang-Bing Deng, Xu-Bing Zhang, Ling-Hong Kong, Zong-Guang Zhou, and Zi-Qiang Wang.
• 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University , Chengdu, China .
• J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jun 1; 28 (6): 637-644.

AimTo compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for low rectal cancer.MethodsPatients with low rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery at our department from January 2009 to December 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The primary end points were 3-year local recurrence and overall and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.ResultsLaparoscopic group had longer operative time (165.0 versus 140.0, P < .001), less blood loss (20.0 versus 40.0, P < .001), shorter length of incision (5.0 versus 18.0, P < .001), and more lymph node harvested (11.0 versus 9.0, P = .002). However, time to first flatus (P = .941), postoperative hospital stay (P = .095), postoperative complications (P = .155), and 30-day mortality (P = .683) was similar between two groups. With the median follow-up period of 65 months, the 3-year local recurrence rate was 4.3% in laparoscopic group and 7.5% in open group (P = .077); the 3-year overall and DFS rates were similar in two groups (85.9% versus 88.8%, P = .229 and 76.9% versus 79.2%, P = .448, respectively); and the overall and DFS curves were comparable between two groups (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.858, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.709-1.037, P = .112 and HR = 1.076, 95% CI 0.834-1.389, P = .275, respectively).ConclusionsLaparoscopic surgery is safe and has equivalent long-term oncologic outcomes for low rectal cancer when compared to open surgery. Furthermore, large-scale, prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm the present findings.

27 keywords...

hide…