• Med Staff Couns · Jan 1988

    The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review.

    • P S Gainer and J J Miles.
    • Med Staff Couns. 1988 Jan 1; 2 (4): 13-21.

    AbstractIn analyzing the effect of Patrick v. Burget upon peer review, the authors conclude that the decision was not "an atom bomb" and that physicians who wish to work for changes in state law to ensure the availability of the state action exemption for peer review actions will find substantial guidance in the decision.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…