-
- Thomas J Watson and Jiejing Qiu.
- Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York. Electronic address: thomas_watson@urmc.rochester.edu.
- Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2016 Apr 1; 101 (4): 1271-9; discussion 1979-80.
BackgroundLung resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is associated with multiple clinical benefits compared with resection by thoracotomy (OPEN). Less is known about reimbursements, costs, and resource use with each approach. This study used a commercial insurance claims database to examine differences between VATS and OPEN lung resections in payment, health care utilization, and estimated days off work for health care visits.MethodsAll adult inpatient discharges for patients undergoing VATS or OPEN lung resection in 2010 were identified from the Truven MarketScan Database (Ann Arbor, MI).ResultsA total of 2,611 patients underwent lobectomy (VATS, 270; OPEN, 669) or wedge resection (VATS, 1,332; OPEN, 340). After adjustment, OPEN lobectomies had a longer length of stay (mean difference, 1.79 days) and higher payment to hospitals (mean difference, $3,497) and physicians (mean difference, $433) compared with VATS. Similar findings were noted after wedge resections. OPEN lobectomies had 1.28-times and 1.14-times more health care utilization days within 90 days and 365 days, respectively, after the operation compared with VATS, translating into increased expenditures of $3,260 at 90 days and $822 at 365 days for OPEN procedures. No significant differences in utilization were noted between OPEN and VATS wedge resections, except for fewer outpatient visits within 90 days in the OPEN group.ConclusionsCompared with an OPEN approach, lobectomy and wedge resection by VATS were associated with lower hospital and physician payments. In addition, lobectomy by VATS was associated with less health care utilization in the early postoperative period and during the first year after the operation. These payment and utilization reductions are important in an era of value-based purchasing in health care.Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.