• Int Angiol · Dec 1996

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Transcutaneous oxygen pressure as predictive parameter for ulcer healing in endstage vascular patients treated with spinal cord stimulation.

    • L G Claeys and S Horsch.
    • Department of Vascular Surgery, General Hospital Cologne-Porz, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Int Angiol. 1996 Dec 1;15(4):344-9.

    Objective And DesignThis study was designed to test the hypothesis that initial TcPO2 helps predict clinical outcome in vascular patients treated with spinal cord stimulation. A randomized-controlled study with one year follow-up was made in 86 Fontaine stage IV patients with endstage peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) undergoing 21 day intravenous prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) therapy for nonhealing ulcers.Materials And MethodsAll patients had arteriosclerosis, 13 also diabetes mellitus. Entry criteria included: non-reconstructible PAOD as proven by intra-arterial angiography or patient condition, ankle systolic pressure < 50 mmHg, severe rest pain despite analgetic medication, and presence of nonhealing foot ulcers or dry gangrene. One week after the start of PGE1 therapy, patients were randomized into receiving SCS plus PGE1 (n = 45 patients), or just PGE1 (n = 41 patients). Follow-up examinations were done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. BASELINE: There were no significant differences between both groups in the following: age, sex distribution, ischemic skin lesions, risk factors and several key group mean physiological values including ankle systolic pressure, ankle/brachial ratio (ABI) and foot TcPO2. The SCS group had more prior vascular leg surgeries (1.77 vs 1.58 per patient). RESULTS AT 12 MONTHS: There was significantly better total healing of foot ulcers in the SCS-group (69 vs 17%; p < 0.0001). Significantly more SCS-patients achieved an outcome of Fontaine stage II (claudication pain, no rest pain or lesions) (40 vs 10%, p = 0.0014). The frequency of minor and major amputations was not different, respectively 13 vs 15% and 16 vs 20%. The mean ABI at 12 months of the treated limb of the SCS-patients was not significantly greater. Foot TcPO2 increased significantly for the SCS-group (+213 vs -2%; p < 0.0001). Patients in either group whose TcPO2 rose to 26.0 +/- 8.6 mmHg on average were able to heal ulcers or toe amputation wounds. PGE1-patients had temporary TcPO2 elevations of about 33% on average but this was gone by six months. SCS-patients had steady increases in TcPO2, and maintained them at 12 months. Among the SCS-patients, those with baseline TcPO2 < = 10 mmHg had significantly less success at 12 months, this was not observed for the OMT-patients. The regional perfusion index increased significantly, 187 vs 0%; p < 0.001.ConclusionsSpinal cord stimulation appears to provide a major benefit for lesion improvement in stage IV patients with non-reconstructible PAOD. Patients with an initial TcPO2 > 10 mmHg will respond better to the stimulation therapy. With pain relief and ulcer healing quality of life improved. Effects on limb salvage do not appear.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.