• Cancer investigation · May 2008

    Expression of multidrug-resistance-related proteins P-glycoprotein, glutathione-S-transferases, topoisomerase-II and lung resistance protein in primary gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma.

    • Hongcan Shi, Dan Lu, Yusheng Shu, Weiping Shi, Shichun Lu, and Kang Wang.
    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clinical College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China. shihongcan@gmail.com.cn
    • Cancer Invest. 2008 May 1; 26 (4): 344-51.

    AimMultidrug resistance (MDR) is closely correlated to an unfavorable prognosis in various human cancers. However, the clinical significance of the expression of MDR-related proteins p-glycoprotein (PGP), glutathione-s-transferases (GST-pi), topoisomerase-II (Topo-II) and lung resistance protein (LRP) in primary gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma (PGCA) remains unclear. In this present study, the total of the four kinds of MDR-related proteins mentioned above were detected by using immunohistochemistry, and their clinical significance in chemoresistance were also investigated.MethodsThis retrospective study included 69 resected specimens from patients with PGCA. The expression of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections was determined by a labelled streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemical technique, and the results were analyzed in correlation with clinicopathological data. None of these patients received chemotherapy prior to surgery.ResultsThe positive rates of expression of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in malignant tissues (49.2%, 75.4%, 68.1% and 58%, respectively) were all higher than that of the normal tissues(0, 30%, 20% and 0, respectively, P < 0.01). PGP expression in tumors that had metastasized was significantly more frequent than in tumors that had not metastasized (67.5% vs 24.1%, P < 0.01). The expression of PGP was closely related with clinicopathologic staging (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 28.6% vs 58.3%, P < 0.05). No significant correlation was shown between PGP and increasing differentiated degree (40%, 42.4% and 61.5%, P > 0.05). GST-pi expression status progressively increased with increasing differentiated degree (40%, 75.8% and 88.5%, P < 0.05) and clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 57.1% vs 83.3%, P < 0.05). In addition, a significant positive correlation was also observed between GST-pi and lymphatic metastasis (with vs. without metastasis, 87.5% vs 58.6%, P < 0.05). The expression of Topo-II was associated with increasing differentiated degree (33.3%, 69.7 and 80.7%, P < 0.01). No significant differences with Topo-II expression were found in relation to the clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 57.1% vs 72.9%, P > 0.05) and lymphatic metastasis (with vs. without metastasis, 65.0% vs 72.4%, P > 0.05). Moreover, a significant difference with the expression of LRP was found in relation to the clinicopathologic stage (staging 1/2 vs 3/4, 38% vs 66.6%, P < 0.05), and lymphatic metastasis (with vs without metastasis, 70.0% vs 41.4%, P < 0.05). Comparing the well, moderately and poorly differentiated cohort, a non-statistical increasing trend towards LRP expression status was noted (50.0%, 54.5% and 65.3%, respectively, P > 0.05). Besides, the co-expression of all four tested MDR-related proteins also existed. The positive rates of co-expression of PGP and GST-pi, PGP and Topo-II, PGP and LRP, GST-pi and Topo-II, LRP and GST-pi, LRP and Topo-II, PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP in malignant cells were 23.2%, 15.9%, 11.6%, 13.0, 26.1, 7.24, 5.8, respectively.ConclusionsMDR-related proteins PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II alpha and LRP are involved in multiple mechanisms of drug resistance in PGCA. Combined determination of PGP, GST-pi, Topo-II and LRP may be prospectively valuable for optimizing the chemotherapy regimes, developing high quality anti-cancer drugs, and further predicting the outcomes of those patients with PGCA.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…