• D Jeffrey Demanes, Alvaro A Martinez, Michel Ghilezan, Dennis R Hill, Lionel Schour, David Brandt, and Gary Gustafson.
• California Endocurietherapy at UCLA, Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine of the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. jdemanes@mednet.ucla.edu
• Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011 Dec 1; 81 (5): 1286-92.

PurposeHigh-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy used as the only treatment (monotherapy) for early prostate cancer is consistent with current concepts in prostate radiobiology, and the dose is reliably delivered in a prospectively defined anatomic distribution that meets all the requirements for safe and effective therapy. We report the disease control and toxicity of HDR monotherapy from California Endocurietherapy (CET) and William Beaumont Hospital (WBH) in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients.Methods And MaterialsThere were 298 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with HDR monotherapy between 1996 and 2005. Two biologically equivalent hypofractionation protocols were used. At CET the dose was 42 Gy in six fractions (two implantations 1 week apart) delivered to a computed tomography-defined planning treatment volume. At WBH the dose was 38 Gy in four fractions (one implantation) based on intraoperative transrectal ultrasound real-time treatment planning. The bladder, urethral, and rectal dose constraints were similar. Toxicity was scored with the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 5.2 years. The median age of the patients was 63 years, and the median value of the pretreatment prostate-specific antigen was 6.0 ng/mL. The 8-year results were 99% local control, 97% biochemical control (nadir +2), 99% distant metastasis-free survival, 99% cause-specific survival, and 95% overall survival. Toxicity was scored per event, meaning that an individual patient with more than one symptom was represented repeatedly in the morbidity data table. Genitourinary toxicity consisted of 10% transient Grade 2 urinary frequency or urgency and 3% Grade 3 episode of urinary retention. Gastrointestinal toxicity was <1%.ConclusionsHigh disease control rates and low morbidity demonstrate that HDR monotherapy is safe and effective for patients with localized prostate cancer.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…