• Jonas Amstrup Funder, Steffen Ringgaard, Markus Winther Frost, Per Wierup, Kaj-Erik Klaaborg, Vibeke Hjortdal, Hans Nygaard, and John Michael Hasenkam.
• Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. funder@ki.au.dk
• Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun 1; 10 (6): 976-80.

AbstractA flexible aortic root is essential for natural leaflet stress distribution. It is suggested that stentless bioprosthetic valves retain the flexibility of native valves. We investigated aortic root distensibility and cross-sectional area (CSA) in stentless (Solo, n=4; Toronto SPV, n=7), stented (Mitroflow, n=8) and in native valves (n=8) in pigs. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to assess aortic root areas. At the annular level the Solo valve had a larger CSA (2.83+/-0.26 cm(2)) than both the Mitroflow (2.24+/-0.23 cm(2)) and Toronto SPV (1.87+/-0.59 cm(2)) (P=0.003; P=0.01). At the sino-tubular junction the Mitroflow valve had a significantly larger CSA (2.96+/-0.80 cm(2)) than the Toronto SPV (2.05+/-0.47 cm(2); P=0.02). At the annular level the percentage change in area between end-diastole and end-systole was lower for the Mitroflow than for all the other valves (P=0.006). No difference was found between native and stentless valves. In conclusion, the Solo valve had a larger CSA at the annulus than both the Mitroflow and the Toronto SPV. However, the stentless valves had a smaller CSA at the sino-tubular junction than the Mitroflow. We, furthermore, found that implantation of stentless heart valves preserves aortic root distensibility at the annular level in pigs.

17 keywords...

hide…