• D Wai, A Ferrier, S Collings, and C Laverty.
• Westmead Hospital, Sydney.
• Aust Fam Physician. 1996 Jan 1; Suppl 1: S44-8.

ObjectiveTo assess the attitudes and knowledge of a sample of NSW general practitioners on issues concerning Papanicolaou (Pap) smear tests after the 1991 National Guidelines were established.DesignDuring January-March 1994, a sample of Sydney general practitioners obtained from a list from the Department of General Practice, Royal North Shore Hospital, were asked to complete a questionnaire based on Pap smear screening. Issues explored included the perceived value of Pap smears, views on recommended screening intervals and the type of patients believed to be at highest risk of developing cervical cancer.SettingNorthern Sydney metropolitan area.ResultsSeventy of 104 general practitioners from the Department of General Practice, Royal North Shore Hospital, returned completed questionnaires. Ninety-five per cent of respondents rated the Pap-smear as an extremely valuable screening test for cervical cancer prevention. The majority of GPs surveyed tended to overscreen younger patients and underscreen both older women and those at highest risk of developing cervical cancer. Seventy-seven per cent of doctors indicated the use of a patient reminder system, in most cases provided by a pathology laboratory but 43% were unaware of the NSW Cancer Council's reminder service.ConclusionOur study suggests that Pap smears are viewed as an important means of cervical cancer prevention. Unfortunately the majority of respondents did not adhere to the recommended guidelines of 2-yearly screening. Possible changes to the current system include improved awareness of the 1991 National Guidelines, greater public awareness of the NSW Cancer Council reminder service, and the establishment of a state cytology registry.

28 keywords...

hide…