• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Aug 2006

    Does bilateral ITA grafting increase perioperative complications? Outcome of 4462 patients with bilateral versus 4204 patients with single ITA bypass.

    • Brigitte Gansera, Fabian Schmidtler, Guido Gillrath, Ilias Angelis, Klaus Wenke, Josef Weingartner, Suat Yönden, and Bernhard Michael Kemkes.
    • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, City-Hospital Munich-Bogenhausen, Englschalkingerstr. 77, 81925 Munich, Germany. brigitte_gansera@web.de
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Aug 1; 30 (2): 318-23.

    ObjectiveSuperior patency of internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting to saphenous veins is conclusive. The aim of the present study was to compare the early outcome of patients receiving either bilateral ITA (BITA) or single ITA (SITA) grafts and to identify risk factors for perioperative complications, such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, or advanced age.MethodsAll 8666 patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, including emergent cases or redos) operated between January 1994 and June 2004 receiving either BITA (n=4462) or SITA (n=4204) grafting were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic data were comparable for both groups concerning mean age (65.3+/-9.4 years vs 64.9+/-9.3 years), range (35-89 years (p=0.05)), diabetes incidence (29.3% vs 2.6% (p=0.08)), dialysis-dependent renal failure (0.7% vs 0.6% (p=0.4)), preoperative ejection fraction (EF) mean (61.8% vs 61.2% (p=0.07)) but not for gender (80.4% vs 76.7% males (p=0.00)), body mass index (BMI) mean (27.2+/-3.6 vs 26.9+/-3.5 (p=0.00)), COPD (7.0% vs 8.5% (p=0.00)), and hyperlipidemia (78.3% vs 74.3% (p=0.00)). In the BITA group, right ITA (RITA) was directed preferentially to the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left ITA (LITA) to the lateral wall. In the SITA group, the LAD was revascularized with the left ITA. Additional bypasses were performed with saphenous vein grafts (SVG).ResultsThe number of anastomoses was higher in the BITA group (3.8+/-0.9 vs 3.1+/-0.9 (p=0.00)); therefore, duration of surgery (mean: 189+/-46.3 min vs 164+/-46.2 min) and cross-clamp time (62.0+/-17.9 min vs 51.0+/-18.0 min) significantly prolonged (p=0.00). Incidence of rethoracotomy due to bleeding (2.9% vs 0.6%; p=0.00) or sternal refixation with (0.7% vs 0.2%; p=0.00) or without infection (1.4% vs 0.6%; p=0.00) was higher in the BITA group, strongly associated with diabetes mellitus and duration of surgery but not with BMI>27. Thirty-day mortality revealed 2.6% versus 3.2% (p=0.1) but was significantly lower for diabetic patients in the BITA group (3.1% vs 4.7%; p=0.00).ConclusionsCABG using both ITAs can be performed routinely with good clinical results and low mortality. Compared with single ITA grafting, sternal and bleeding complications were slightly increased. Diabetes mellitus, BITA grafting, duration of surgery but not obesity or COPD could be identified as independent risk factors for sternal complications. Dialysis-dependent renal failure, EF<30%, emergent cases, and the absence of BITA grafting were predictors for increased perioperative mortality.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.