• A C Webster, P K Morley-Forster, V Janzen, J Watson, S L Dain, D Taves, and D Dantzer.
• Department of Anaesthesia, St. Joseph's Health Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. webster1@julian.uwo.ca
• Anesth. Analg. 1999 Feb 1;88(2):421-5.

UnlabelledThe purpose of the study was to assess the suitability and safety of the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway (FRLMA) for intranasal surgery (INS) anesthesia. A secondary objective was to compare the incidence of complications of removal of the FRLMA with tracheal extubation in awake and anesthetized patients. One hundred fourteen ASA physical status I and II patients requiring INS were randomly assigned into three groups: Group I = FRLMA, Group II = endotracheal tube (ET) extubated awake, and Group II = ET extubated deeply anesthetized. In Group I, the incidence of coughing and oxyhemoglobin desaturation at removal was significantly reduced compared with that in Groups II and III (P < 0.05). There were no episodes of postremoval laryngospasm in Group I; in Group III, the incidence was 19% (P < 0.05), whereas in Group II, it was 6% (not significantly different). The number of patients with oxyhemoglobin desaturation < or = 92% on admission to the postanesthesia care unit was 0% in Group I, 26% in Group II (P < 0.05), and 16% in Group III (not significantly different). At bronchoscopy, the incidence of blood visible in the airway was low and similar among the three groups (3%, 6%, and 3%, respectively). There were no significant differences in the incidence of airway complications between Groups II and III.ImplicationsWe compared airway management for intranasal surgery anesthesia using a new device, the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway, with the current standard of tracheal intubation. The study demonstrates that the flexible reinforced laryngeal mask airway can provide a safe, protected airway with a smoother emergence from anesthesia than tracheal intubation.

35 keywords...

hide…