-
Investigative radiology · Feb 2004
Comparative StudyDual-probe radiofrequency ablation: an in vitro experimental study in bovine liver.
- Jeong Min Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Joon Koo Han, Byung Jai Youn, Se Hyung Kim, and Byung Ihn Choi.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine.
- Invest Radiol. 2004 Feb 1;39(2):89-96.
ObjectiveTo determine whether alternative radiofrequency (RF) application with dual probes has advantages over sequential or simultaneous RF application for creating larger coagulation necrosis.Materials And MethodsUsing 2 17-gauge internally cooled electrodes and a 200-watt generator (CC-3 model, Radionics), RF energy was applied sequentially (group A, n = 20), simultaneously (group B, n = 20), or alternately (group C, n = 20) to explanted bovine liver. After preliminary experiments with a probe distance of 2-5 cm, a distance of 2 cm and 3 cm were chosen for main experiments. Total duration of the RF application was 10 minutes. In the alternative mode, the energy was applied alternately to both RF electrodes in 2-second intervals. Changes occurring in tissue impedance, current, power output, and temperature at the midpoint between the 2 electrodes were measured. The technical parameters, temperatures, and dimension of the ablated area were compared in the 3 groups using analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test.ResultsIn the groups B and C, the impedance was gradually decreased during RF application and the mean current flow of both groups was 1550 +/- 130 mA and 1375 +/- 175 mA, respectively. However, in the group A, the impedance was markedly increased during RF application, and the mean current was 940 +/- 484 mA (P < 0.05, between groups A and B, and groups A and C). With 3-cm spacing, the alternative RF application created oval-shaped ablation zones with larger shortest axis diameter at the midpoint than either the sequential or simultaneous RF application: 12.0 +/- 7.1 mm in group A; 27.0 +/- 3.1 mm in group B; 34.9 +/- 3.4 mm in group C (P < 0.05). With 2 cm spacing, the corresponding figures were 25.3 +/- 7.8 mm in group A; 34.9 +/- 7.8 mm in group B; 41.5 +/- 1.8 mm in group C (P < 0.05): the differences between groups A and B, and between groups A and C were statistically significant (P < 0.05). With 3-cm spacing, the temperature at the midpoint between the 2 probes was higher in group C (102 degrees C) than in either the group A (62 degrees C) or the group B (78 degrees C; P < 0.05). With 2-cm spacing, groups B and C showed higher temperature than group A (P < 0.05), but the difference between groups B and C was not significant (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe alternative RF application creates larger, more regular ablation zones than either the sequential or simultaneous RF application. This result suggests that use of an alternating RF power application will improve the results of RF ablation for the treatment of larger tumors.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.