-
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Nov 2012
Comparative StudyThe effect of morphologic subtype on outcomes following the Sano-Norwood procedure.
- Bari Murtuza, Oliver Stumper, Douglas Wall, John Stickley, Timothy J Jones, David J Barron, and William J Brawn.
- Department of Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
- Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Nov 1;42(5):787-93.
ObjectivesControversy exists concerning outcomes of patients with different morphologic subtypes of hypoplastic left heart syndrome undergoing the Norwood procedure, in particular, aortic atresia-mitral stenosis (AA-MS) patients receiving a systemic-pulmonary modified Blalock-Taussig (mBT) shunt. We sought to determine the influence of known risk factors and morphology on early survival in our cohort of Sano-Norwood patients with right ventricle-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) conduits as the source of pulmonary blood flow.MethodsWe studied early survival in patients with Sano-modified Norwood procedures from 2002 to 2010 and included both typical and atypical (including unbalanced atrioventricular canal defect) morphologic variants. We included a comparison group composed of classical Norwood patients with mBT shunts.ResultsOf 264 Sano-Norwood patients, 49 had AA-MS and 30 had atypical morphologies. Weight ≤ 2.5 kg was associated with a poorer 1-year survival (P = 0.0007), though ascending aorta (AscAo) size <2.0 mm was not. We did not observe a difference in 30-day or 1-year Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival across typical morphologic variants for either a Sano or mBTS group. Atypical variants exhibited a trend towards lower 30-day and 1-year survival in both Sano and mBTS groups though this was not significant. Direct comparison of 30-day K-M survival for Sano versus mBTS in AA-MS patients showed similar outcomes (P = NS).ConclusionsUse of the RV-PA conduit results in good early survival, even in those with a small AscAo size. Atypical morphologic variants seem to do worse irrespective of the Sano or mBTS group. Further studies will be required to determine conclusively whether the RV-PA shunt confers protective effects in the AA-MS subgroup compared with the mBTS.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.