• E Baedorf Kassis, S H Loring, and D Talmor.
• Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Bulfinch 108, 02114, Boston, MA, USA. enbaedor@bidmc.harvard.edu.
• Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Feb 1; 113 (Suppl 1): 13-20.

AbstractEsophageal manometry has traditionally been utilized for respiratory physiology research, but clinicians have recently found numerous applications within the intensive care unit. Esophageal pressure (PEs) is a surrogate for pleural pressures (PPl), and the difference between airway pressure (PAO) and PEs provides a good estimate for the pressure across the lung also known as the transpulmonary pressure (PL). Differentiating the effects of mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing on the respiratory system, chest wall, and across the lung allows for improved personalization in clinical decision making. Measuring PL in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may help set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent derecruitment and atelectrauma, while assuring peak pressures do not cause over distension during tidal breathing and recruitment maneuvers. Monitoring PEs allows improved insight into patient-ventilator interactions and may help in decisions to adjust sedation and paralytics to correct dyssynchrony. Intrinsic PEEP (auto-PEEP) may be monitored using esophageal manometry, which may also improve patient comfort and synchrony with the ventilator. Finally, during weaning, PEs may be used to better predict weaning success and allow for rapid intervention during failure. Improved consistency in definition and terminology and further outcomes research is needed to encourage more widespread adoption; however, with clear clinical benefit and increased ease of use, it appears time to reintroduce basic physiology into personalized ventilator management in the intensive care unit.

14 keywords...

hide…