• Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol · Jun 2012

    An overview of a 30-year experience with amniocentesis in a single tertiary medical center in Taiwan.

    • Yi-Wen Chang, Chia-Ming Chang, Pi-Lin Sung, Ming-Jie Yang, Wai Hou Li, Hsin-Yang Li, Ling-Chao Chen, Ling-Yi Cheng, Yu-Ling Lai, Yung-Yung Cheng, Wen-Hsun Chang, Kuan-Chong Chao, and Peng-Hui Wang.
    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
    • Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jun 1; 51 (2): 206-11.

    ObjectiveAmniocentesis is a popular and effective prenatal diagnostic tool for chromosomal disorders. It is well-established that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities increases with maternal age; however, other related indications are seldom reported. Herein, we report our 30-year experience with amniocentesis from a single medical center, focusing on the indications and rates of abnormality.Material And MethodsA retrospective review of 16,749 pregnant women in the mid-trimester between January 1981 and December 2010 was conducted. The medical records were analyzed.ResultsThe indications for amniocentesis were advanced maternal age (≥ 34 years old) (n=10,970, 65.5%), increasing-risk maternal triple-marker Down's screening test (≥ 1/270) (n=2090, 12.5%), history of abnormal offspring birth (n=792, 4.7%), abnormal ultrasound findings (n=484, 2.9%), parent with abnormal karyotype (n=252, 1.5%), family history of chromosomal abnormality (n=183, 1.1%), drug and radiation exposure (n=165), abnormal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) results (n=25), intrauterine fetal death (n=50), and other non-specific causes (n=1662, 9.9%). The rate of abnormality for each indication was 16% in the abnormal CVS group, 12% in the intrauterine fetal death group, 11.5% for parental chromosomal abnormality, 8.7% in the abnormal ultrasound finding group, 3.0% in the increasing-risk maternal triple-marker Down's screening test group, 2.5% in the advanced maternal age group, 1.5% for other non-specific causes, 1.4% for history of abnormal offspring birth, and 1.1% for family history of chromosomal abnormality.ConclusionsBoth parents with abnormal karyotype and abnormal ultrasound findings are indications for which consideration of further amniocentesis is highly recommended.Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.