• Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg · Jun 2022

    Conservative treatment of ulnar styloid fractures following volar-plate fixation of distal radius fractures: incidence of nonunion evaluated by computed tomography.

    • Shinsuke Morisaki, Shinji Tsuchida, Ryo Oda, and Kenji Takahashi.
    • Saiseikai Shigaken Hospital, Ritto, Japan. morisaki@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
    • Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Jun 1; 48 (3): 2247-2254.

    PurposeThe first aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of ulnar styloid fractures (USFs) accompanied by distal radius fractures (DRFs), treated with volar locking plates. The fracture type of DRFs was evaluated by the classifications, based on computed tomography (CT) scan findings. The second aim was to investigate the bone union rate of USFs, depending on the fracture type of DRFs, by comparing union and nonunion groups in the USFs groups.MethodsBetween May 2012 and December 2019, 239 consecutive patients with DRFs were treated. Of these patients, 177 DRFs met inclusion criteria. The fracture patterns of the DRFs, based on the classification, using CT scans, which included the AO classification, sagittal angulation, and axial fracture patterns of the articular surface of the distal radius in two-part intra-articular fractures were evaluated. The size of USFs, classified as a tip or base fracture was also investigated.ResultsThe incidence of USFs was significantly higher for AO types A and C than for type B. Analysis of the sagittal angulation of DRFs showed that the incidence of USFs was higher for the extension type than for the flexion type. Axial CT classification of two-part fractures revealed that DRFs with a dorsal fracture line was more frequent than the volar type of DRFs. These results suggested that dorsal displacement of DRFs was associated with a higher incidence of USFs. Finally, the analysis of the bone union rate of USFs revealed that AO classification and sagittal angulation were not correlated with bone union in USFs. However, it was found that a fracture line on the radial side of the radius had a significantly low rate of bone union, compared to a fracture line on the dorsal side. The size of USFs was also not correlated with the bone union rate.ConclusionsThe incidence and the bone union rate of USFs have different patterns. The incidence of USFs was higher in the dorsal displacement type of DRFs. However, the bone union rate of USFs was lower for a fracture line on the radial side. Therefore, USFs with DRFs that have a fracture line on the radial side is a candidate for fixation to prevent nonunion.© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…