• A van Ophoven and J Pannek.
• Schwerpunkt für Neuro-Urologie, Stiftung Katholisches Krankenhaus, Marienhospital Herne, Klinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Widumer Straße 8, 44627 Herne, Deutschland. arndt.vanophoven@marienhospital-herne.de
• Urologe A. 2012 Feb 1;51(2):212-6.

AbstractDue to the increasing popularity of neuromodulation, the number of indications and patient groups to which this technique is offered is also increasing. We evaluated the currently available data concerning neuromodulation in geriatric patients, children and patients with spinal cord injury and potential alternatives regarding neural targets and implantation techniques.The evidence of the use of neuromodulation in these patient groups is low. In geriatric patients, the use of neuromodulation seems to be justified. The few existing results concerning neuromulation in children are positive; however, there are no data about long term effects of neuromodulation on the growing organism. In patients with spinal cord injury, neuromodulation by microsurgical nerve anastomosis does not seem to be successful. According to the preliminary data of a single study, neuromodulation in acute spinal cord injury may prevent development of a neurogenic bladder dysfunction. The laparoscopic implantation of electrodes for neuromodulation unfolds new technical opportunities; however, until today there is no proof of the efficacy of this technique. Pudendal neuromodulation appears to be a meaningful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for selected indications.The existing studies demonstrate the future opportunities of neuromodulation also in geriatric patients, children and patientens with spinal cord injuries. However, especially in the latter two groups, further studies concerning effectiveness and long term consequences are mandatory prior to offering these techniques to patients in everyday practise.

23 keywords...

hide…