• Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss · Nov 2000

    Clinical Trial

    [Study of the reproducibility of cardiac output measurement during exercise in pre-pubertal children by doppler echocardiography and CO2 inhalation].

    • S Nottin, A Vinet, A M Lecoq, P Guenon, and P Obert.
    • Laboratoire de la performance motrice, faculté du sport et de l'éducation physique, université d'Orléans La Source, rue de Vendôme, BP 6237, 45062 Orléans.
    • Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2000 Nov 1;93(11):1297-303.

    AbstractNon-invasive measurement of the cardiac output is essential in investigations of healthy children. However, the data concerning the reproducibility of the measurements are very limited. The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the measurement of cardiac output during exercise by Doppler echocardiography and reinhalation of CO2 (extrapolation method). Fourteen pre-pubertal children underwent two similar tests at increasingly intense levels of exercise. The cardiac output was measured at rest and during the last minute of each stepwise increment of exercise. The results show no difference between the cardiac outputs of the two tests, whichever method was used and at all levels of exercise. They also demonstrate a better reproducibility of cardiac output measurement by Doppler echocardiography (coefficient of variation: 7.5% at rest and 5.2% at maximal effort) compared with reinhalation of CO2 (coefficient of variation: 16.8% at rest and 11.7% at maximal effort). Both methods showed better reproducibility on exercise, resulting from smaller variations in heart rate and stroke volume on effort than at rest. The authors conclude that Doppler echocardiography is very accurate and its simplicity makes it the method of choice in pre-pubertal children for measuring cardiac output during exercise.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…