-
- E M Fine and G S Rubin.
- Lions Vision Center, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. fine@vision.eri.harvard.edu
- Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Jul 1; 76 (7): 468-73.
AbstractCentral field loss (CFL) and cataract both decrease visual acuity. For patients with CFL, visual acuity is further reduced when the acuity target is more visually complex. We tested visual acuity for targets of varying complexity (letters alone, letters flanked by one or two x's on each side, and words) in subjects with normal vision and in the presence of a simulated cataract, simulated scotoma, and their combination (scotoma + cataract). Visual acuity was best with normal vision and worst with scotoma + cataract for all of the acuity targets. There was little difference in visual acuity between the letters alone and flanked letters, and visual acuity was best for words under all vision conditions. The cataract had a greater impact on visual acuity when the subject's central visual field was clear (normal vision) than when it was occluded by the simulated scotoma.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.