• Elzbieta Mlodawska, Anna Tomaszuk-Kazberuk, Paulina Lopatowska, Marcin Kaminski, and Wlodzimierz J Musial.
• Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
• Intern Med J. 2017 Mar 1; 47 (3): 275-279.

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring in 2% of the population. It is known that AF increases morbidity and limits quality of life. The CHA2 DS2 VASc score (congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension, age ≥75 (doubled), diabetes, stroke (doubled), vascular disease, age 65-74 and sex category (female)) is widely used to assess thrombotic complications. The CHA2 DS2 VASc score was not used until now in predicting the effectiveness of electrical cardioversion.AimTo assess the value of CHA2 DS2 VASc score in predicting unsuccessful electrical cardioversion.MethodsWe analysed 258 consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent electrical cardioversion between January 2012 and April 2016 in a Cardiology University Centre in Poland.ResultsOut of 3500 hospitalised patients with AF, 258 (mean age 64 ± 11 years, 64% men) underwent electrical cardioversion. The CHA2 DS2 VASc score in analysed population (258 patients) was 2.5 ± 1.7 (range 0-8), and the HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal liver or renal function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalised ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol) was 1 ± 0.9 (range 0-4). Electrical cardioversion was unsuccessful in 12%. Factors associated with unsuccessful cardioversion were age (P = 0.0005), history of ischaemic stroke (P = 0.04), male gender (P = 0.01) and CHA2 DS2 VASc score (P = 0.002). The CHA2 DS2 VASc score in patients who had unsuccessful cardioversion was higher compared to patients who had successful cardioversion - 3.5 versus 2.4 (P = 0.001). In the logistic regression model, if the CHA2 DS2 VASc score increases by 1, the odds of unsuccessful cardioversion increase by 39% (odds ratio (OR) 1.39; confidence interval (CI): 1.12-1.71; P = 0.002). The odds of unsuccessful cardioversion are three times higher in patients with a CHA2 DS2 VASc score ≥ 2 than in patients with a CHA2 DS2 VASc score of 0 or 1 (OR 3.06; CI: 1.03-9.09; P = 0.044).ConclusionThe CHA2 DS2 VASc score routinely used in thromboembolic risk assessment may be a simple, easy and reliable scoring system that can be used to predict unsuccessful electrical cardioversion.© 2016 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.

26 keywords...

hide…