• Rahul A Patel, Sina J Torabi, David A Kasle, Vishal Narwani, and R Peter Manes.
• Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Road, North Haven, CT 06473, United States of America; Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, United States of America.
• Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Nov 1; 42 (6): 103140.

PurposeTo evaluate billing trends, Medicare reimbursement, and practice setting for Medicare-billing otolaryngologists (ORLs) performing in-office face computerized tomography (CT) scans.MethodsThis retrospective study included data on Medicare-billing ORLs from Medicare Part B: Provider Utilization and Payment Datafiles (2012-2018). Number of Medicare-billing ORLs performing in-office CT scans, and total sums and medians for Medicare reimbursements, services performed, and number of patients were gathered along with geographic and practice-type distributions.ResultsIn 2018, roughly 1 in 7 Medicare-billing ORLs was performing in-office CT scans, an increase from 1 in 10 in 2012 (48.2% growth). From 2012 to 2018, there has been near-linear growth in number of in-office CT scans performed (58.2% growth), and number of Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients receiving an in-office CT scan (64.8% growth). However, at the median, the number of in-office CT scans performed and number of Medicare FFS patients receiving an in-office CT, per physician, has remained constant, despite a decline of 42.3% (2012: $227.67; 2018: $131.26) in median Medicare reimbursements.ConclusionThough sharp declines have been seen in Medicare reimbursement, a greater proportion of Medicare-billing ORLs have been performing in-office face CT scans, while median number of in-office CT scans per ORL has remained constant. Although further investigation is certainly warranted, this analysis suggests that ORLs, at least in the case of the Medicare FFS population, are utilizing in-office CT imaging for preoperative planning, pathologic diagnosis, and patient convenience, rather than increased revenue streams. Future studies should focus on observing these billing trends among private insurers.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

6 keywords...

hide…