• Danish medical journal · Dec 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Reduced specialist time with direct computed tomography for suspected lung cancer in primary care.

    • Louise Mahncke Guldbrandt, Morten Fenger-Grøn, Birgitte Holst Folkersen, Torben Riis Rasmussen, and Peter Vedsted.
    • Center for Forskning i Cancerdiagnostik i Praksis, Forskningsenheden for Almen Praksis, Aarhus Universitet, Bartholins Allé 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. louise.mahncke@alm.au.dk.
    • Dan Med J. 2013 Dec 1; 60 (12): A4738.

    IntroductionLung cancer (LC) is the most common cause of cancer death in Denmark, and triaging patients through fast-track diagnostic pathways is recommended to improve patient outcome. Data on the most efficient triage organisation of such pathways are limited. The aim of this study was to test a strategy of a straight-to-test model for patients referred to the fast-track pathway. Outcomes were number of computed tomographies (CT) performed, use of specialist time and staff acceptability.Material And MethodsWe performed a randomised controlled study enrolling 493 patients who were referred from general practice to fast-track LC evaluation (1 January-1 December 2012). Half of the patients were randomly assigned to the intervention and went straight to a chest CT before chest-physician evaluation. Time was measured for patients at random days. Acceptability was examined in a focus group interview.ResultsIn the intervention group, 95.5% of patients had a CT performed compared with 97.2% in the control group. There was no difference in the number of CTs between the groups (risk difference (RD) = 1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4-2.0; p = 0.454)). In the intervention group, chest-physician time was 13.3 min. (min.-max.: 7.7-19.5 min.) lower per referred patient than in the control group.ConclusionGiving general practitioners direct access to a CT did not change the number of CTs performed and significantly reduced chest-physician time per patient. In addition, the strategy was associated with high levels of staff acceptability.FundingThe project was supported by the Danish Cancer Research Foundation, the Danish Cancer Society and the Novo Nordisk Foundation.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01779726.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.