• Thorac Cardiovasc Surg · Oct 2000

    Comparative Study

    Complete arterial revascularization using T-graft technique in diabetics with coronary three-vessel disease.

    • T Markwirth, B Hennen, B Scheller, H J Schäfers, and O Wendler.
    • Medizinische Klinik III (Kardiologie/Angiologie) Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany. inmark@med-rz.uni-sb.de
    • Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Oct 1; 48 (5): 269-73.

    BackgroundCoronary revascularization using exclusively arterial grafts holds the promise of improved long-term patency. The T-graft approach achieves this goal with only two arterial grafts in coronary 3-vessel disease. Arterial grafts in diabetics, however, exhibit more frequently atherosclerotic wall abnormalities, and higher levels of endothelin-1 were found in diabetic arterial grafts, which may be associated with a higher incidence of vasoconstriction. The objective of this prospective study was to compare functional und angiographic parameters of arterial T-grafts in diabetics and nondiabetics.MethodsCoronary angiography was performed consecutively in 20 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), 20 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and 100 non-diabetics one week after complete arterial revascularization with T-grafts. Graft patency was assessed, and the diameter of the proximal left internal mammary artery (IMA) graft was measured using quantitative coronary analysis. Absolute flow volume in the proximal left IMA was measured using the flow-wire technique at baseline and after an adenosine injection into the graft to induce maximal hyperemia. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as the ratio of maximal to baseline flow.ResultsThere was no difference between patients with IDDM, patients with NIDDM and non-diabetics with respect to patency (98.3% vs. 98.8% vs. 97,8%, n.s.), graft lumen diameter (3.42 +/- 0.48 vs. 3.36 +/- 0.50 vs. 3.38 +/- 0.41 mm, n.s.), baseline flow (78.4 +/- 34.3 vs. 83.1 +/- 36.6 vs. 81.5 +/- 39.0 ml/min, n.s.), and CFR (1.85 +/- 0.37 vs. 1.89 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.90 +/- 0.40, n.s.).ConclusionBaseline parameters (graft diameter and quantitative graft flow), patency and CFR are identical in diabetics and non-diabetics. Our results suggest that diabetic patients with coronary 3-vessel disease take comparable profit from complete arterial revascularization using the T-graft technique as non-diabetics.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.