• J A Mauriello, R Antonacci, R Mostafavi, K Narain, A R Caputo, R S Wagner, and S Palydowicz.
• Department of Ophthalmology, University of Medicine and Dentistry-New Jersey Medical School, Newark 07103-2499, USA.
• Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996 Sep 1; 12 (3): 206-10.

AbstractSixteen patients with combined paresis and restriction of extraocular muscle(s) orbital fracture repair were studied before and after in order to determine the clinical features and management of such patients. All 16 patients showed limited ductions of the involved eye in the field of action of the entrapped, paretic muscle and of the antagonist muscle after orbital fracture. Single extraocular muscles (13 patients) and two extraocular muscles (three patients) were demonstrated adjacent to the fracture site on orbital computed tomography (CT). In three patients prior to orbital surgery, a deviation in primary position was present. After fracture repair with release of the entrapped muscle in all patients, evidence of paresis of the muscle was demonstrated by underaction in its field of action and overaction in the field of its antagonist. There was a resultant manifest tropia or phoria in the primary position. In seven patients, the paresis gradually improved with no tropia and little diplopia in the functional fields of gaze. Three patients had minimal deviations and required no further treatment. Six patients with significant deviations required prisms (three patients) or strabismus surgery (three patients). The latter three patients had two muscles involved. Results of this study demonstrate that the ophthalmologist must appropriately diagnose patients with paresis and restriction of an extraocular muscle and counsel them that "new" diplopia may occur after orbital fracture repair and that this diplopia may require additional therapy.

34 keywords...

hide…