• Eur J Phys Rehabil Med · Mar 2009

    Comparative Study

    A comparison of functional assessment instruments and work status in chronic back pain.

    • M Sivan, B Sell, and P Sell.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester, United Kingdom. drmanojsivan@yahoo.com
    • Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Mar 1; 45 (1): 31-6.

    AimThe aim of this cross sectional study was to analyse whether low back pain (LBP) functional assessment instruments correlate well with work status measures.MethodsThis study was a cross sectional study that enrolled 375 patients with chronic LBP attending back pain outpatient clinics of a University Hospital and a specialist rehabilitation centre over a period of one year. The outcome scores measured were Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. The effect of back pain on their work status was also recorded and correlated to the above instrument values.ResultsThere was a only a modest correlation between work status and the three measured outcome scores, with the Spearman rank correlation being 0.47 for OMPQ, 0.43 for ODI and 0.39 for RMQ.ConclusionThe studied standard LBP outcome measures and work status are not interchangeable. The impact on work status should not be assumed based on the severity of these outcome measures and should be recorded as a separate outcome measure in chronic low back pain.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.