• Tyler Mari, Jessica Henderson, Michelle Maden, Sarah Nevitt, Rui Duarte, and Nicholas Fallon.
• Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Electronic address: Tyler.Mari@liverpool.ac.uk.
• J Pain. 2022 Mar 1; 23 (3): 349-369.

AbstractRecent attempts to utilize machine learning (ML) to predict pain-related outcomes from Electroencephalogram (EEG) data demonstrate promising results. The primary aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of ML algorithms for predicting pain intensity, phenotypes or treatment response from EEG. Electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library were searched. A total of 44 eligible studies were identified, with 22 presenting attempts to predict pain intensity, 15 investigating the prediction of pain phenotypes and seven assessing the prediction of treatment response. A meta-analysis was not considered appropriate for this review due to heterogeneous methods and reporting. Consequently, data were narratively synthesized. The results demonstrate that the best performing model of the individual studies allows for the prediction of pain intensity, phenotypes and treatment response with accuracies ranging between 62 to 100%, 57 to 99% and 65 to 95.24%, respectively. The results suggest that ML has the potential to effectively predict pain outcomes, which may eventually be used to assist clinical care. However, inadequate reporting and potential bias reduce confidence in the results. Future research should improve reporting standards and externally validate models to decrease bias, which would increase the feasibility of clinical translation. PERSPECTIVE: This systematic review explores the state-of-the-art machine learning methods for predicting pain intensity, phenotype or treatment response from EEG data. Results suggest that machine learning may demonstrate clinical utility, pending further research and development. Areas for improvement, including standardized processing, reporting and the need for better methodological assessment tools, are discussed.Copyright © 2021 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…