• Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Dec 2021

    Integrated Biomarkers for the Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules.

    • Michael N Kammer, Dhairya A Lakhani, Aneri B Balar, Sanja L Antic, Amanda K Kussrow, Rebekah L Webster, Shayan Mahapatra, Udaykamal Barad, Chirayu Shah, Thomas Atwater, Brenda Diergaarde, Jun Qian, Alexander Kaizer, Melissa New, Erin Hirsch, William J Feser, Jolene Strong, Matthew Rioth, York E Miller, Yoganand Balagurunathan, Dianna J Rowe, Sherif Helmey, Sheau-Chiann Chen, Joseph Bauza, Stephen A Deppen, Kim Sandler, Fabien Maldonado, Avrum Spira, Ehab Billatos, Matthew B Schabath, Robert J Gillies, David O Wilson, Ronald C Walker, Bennett Landman, Heidi Chen, Eric L Grogan, Anna E Barón, Darryl J Bornhop, and Pierre P Massion.
    • Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine.
    • Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2021 Dec 1; 204 (11): 130613161306-1316.

    AbstractRationale: Patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) at risk of cancer undergo high rates of invasive, costly, and morbid procedures. Objectives: To train and externally validate a risk prediction model that combined clinical, blood, and imaging biomarkers to improve the noninvasive management of IPNs. Methods: In this prospectively collected, retrospective blinded evaluation study, probability of cancer was calculated for 456 patient nodules using the Mayo Clinic model, and patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. A combined biomarker model (CBM) including clinical variables, serum high sensitivity CYFRA 21-1 level, and a radiomic signature was trained in cohort 1 (n = 170) and validated in cohorts 2-4 (total n = 286). All patients were pooled to recalibrate the model for clinical implementation. The clinical utility of the CBM compared with current clinical care was evaluated in 2 cohorts. Measurements and Main Results: The CBM provided improved diagnostic accuracy over the Mayo Clinic model with an improvement in area under the curve of 0.124 (95% bootstrap confidence interval, 0.091-0.156; P < 2 × 10-16). Applying 10% and 70% risk thresholds resulted in a bias-corrected clinical reclassification index for cases and control subjects of 0.15 and 0.12, respectively. A clinical utility analysis of patient medical records estimated that a CBM-guided strategy would have reduced invasive procedures from 62.9% to 50.6% in the intermediate-risk benign population and shortened the median time to diagnosis of cancer from 60 to 21 days in intermediate-risk cancers. Conclusions: Integration of clinical, blood, and image biomarkers improves noninvasive diagnosis of patients with IPNs, potentially reducing the rate of unnecessary invasive procedures while shortening the time to diagnosis.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.