-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Advance Care Planning in Frail Older Adults: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Anouk Overbeek, Ida J Korfage, Lea J Jabbarian, Pascalle Billekens, Bernard J Hammes, Suzanne Polinder, Johan Severijnen, Siebe J Swart, Frederika E Witkamp, Agnes van der Heide, and RietjensJudith A CJACDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands..
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul 1; 66 (6): 1089-1095.
ObjectivesTo determine the effectiveness of advance care planning (ACP) in frail older adults.DesignCluster randomized controlled trial.SettingResidential care homes in the Netherlands (N=16).ParticipantsCare home residents and community-dwelling adults receiving home care (N=201; n=101 intervention; n=100 control). Participants were 75 years and older, frail, and capable of consenting to participation.InterventionAdjusted Respecting Choices ACP program.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was change in patient activation (Patient Activation Measure, PAM-13) between baseline and 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life (SF-12), advance directive (AD) completion, and surrogate decision-maker appointment. Use of medical care in the 12 months after inclusion was also assessed. Multilevel analyses were performed, controlling for clustering effects and differences in demographics.ResultsSeventy-seven intervention participants and 83 controls completed the follow-up assessment. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention (-0.26±11.2) and control group (-1.43±10.6) in change scores of the PAM (p=.43) or the SF-12. Of intervention group participants, 93% completed an AD, and 94% appointed a decision-maker. Of control participants, 34% completed an AD, and 67% appointed a decision-maker (p<.001). No differences in the use of medical care were found.ConclusionsACP did not increase levels of patient activation or quality of life but did increase completion of ADs and appointment of surrogate decision-makers. It did not affect use of medical care.© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.