• J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) · Sep 2014

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of thermodilution, lithium dilution, and pulse contour analysis for the measurement of cardiac output in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs.

    • Juan Morgaz, María Del Mar Granados, Pilar Muñoz-Rascón, Juan Manuel Dominguez, Jose Andrés Fernández-Sarmiento, Rafael J Gómez-Villamandos, and Rocío Navarrete.
    • Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
    • J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2014 Sep 1;24(5):562-70.

    ObjectiveTo (1) evaluate lithium dilution (LiDCO) and transpulmonary thermodilution (PiCCOTD ) in relation to traditional thermodilution (PAC-TD) for determining cardiac output (CO) in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs and to (2) compare the continuous CO values obtained using power analysis (PulseCO) with continuous PiCCO (PiCCOc).DesignProspective randomized study.SettingUniversity research laboratory.AnimalsFourteen healthy Beagles.InterventionsCO was measured using PAC-TD, LiDCO, and PiCCOTD in 3 different hemodynamic states induced in random order and defined on the basis of the mean arterial pressure (MAP). Normodynamic state was defined as the baseline MAP and 1 MAC sevoflurane. The hypodynamic state was induced with a deep level of sevoflurane anesthesia. The hyperdynamic state was induced with noradrenaline. After these measurements were obtained in each hemodynamic state, CO was monitored continuously for 30 min using PulseCO and PiCCOc. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients, and a trend score was determined for the continuous CO measurements.Measurements And Main ResultsThere was good agreement among the 3 modalities of CO measurement in each hemodynamic state. The mean CIPAC-TD /CIPICCOTD bias was -0.04 ± 1.19 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -2.37/1.93 L/min/m(2) ), and the mean CIPAC-TD /CILiDCO bias was -0.11 ± 1.55 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -3.04/2.93 L/min/m(2) ). The mean CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc bias was -0.04 ± 1.91 L/min/m(2) (limits of agreement, -1.95/1.87 L/min/m(2) ), which suggested good agreement. The CIPulseCO -CIPiCCOc trend score, calculated from 252 paired comparisons, was 93.3% positive after zone exclusion (∆CI < 15%).ConclusionsBoth LiDCO and PiCCOTD agreed well with PAC-TD for the measurement of CO under different hemodynamic conditions. Moreover, PiCCOc appears to be an accurate method for monitoring continuous CO in dogs as its performance for measurement was similar to that of PulseCO.© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2014.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.