• A Conti, D G Iacopino, V Fodale, S Micalizzi, O Penna, and L B Santamaria.
• Department of Neurosciences, Psychiatric and Anaesthesiological Sciences, University of Messina, School of Medicine, Policlinico Universitario "G. Martino", via C.Valeria 98125, Messina, Italy.
• Br J Anaesth. 2006 Sep 1;97(3):333-9.

BackgroundSevoflurane or propofol-remifentanil-based anaesthetic regimens represent modern techniques for neurosurgical anaesthesia. Nevertheless, there are potential differences related to their activity on the cerebrovascular system. The magnitude of such difference is not completely known.MethodsIn total 40 patients, treated for spinal or maxillo-facial disorders, were randomly allocated to either i.v. propofol-remifentanil or inhalational sevoflurane anaesthesia. Transcranial Doppler was used to assess changes in cerebral blood flow velocity, carbon dioxide reactivity, cerebral autoregulation and the bispectral index to assess the depth of anaesthesia.ResultsTime-averaged mean flow velocity (MFV) was significantly reduced after induction of anaesthesia in both sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil groups (P<0.001). At deeper levels of anaesthesia, MFV increased in the sevoflurane group, suggesting an uncoupling flow/metabolism, whereas it was further reduced in the propofol-remifentanil group (P<0.001). Indices of cerebral autoregulation were reduced in patients with high-dose sevoflurane whereas autoregulation was preserved in patients anaesthetized with propofol-remifentanil (P<0.001). Higher CO(2) concentrations impaired cerebral autoregulation in the sevoflurane group but not in patients anaesthetized with propofol-remifentanil.ConclusionsPropofol-remifentanil anaesthesia induced a dose-dependent low-flow state with preserved cerebral autoregulation, whereas sevoflurane at high doses provided a certain degree of luxury perfusion.

37 keywords...

hide…