• Ulus Travma Acil Cer · Sep 2021

    The comparison of tracheostomy and translaryngeal intubation regarding free radical formation and pulmonary effects.

    • Figen Türk, Cansel Atınkaya, Gökhan Yüncü, Yasin Ekinci, Barbaros Şahin, Habip Atalay, Hülya Aybek, and Ferda Bir.
    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, İzmir Dr. Suat Seren Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir-Turkey.
    • Ulus Travma Acil Cer. 2021 Sep 1; 27 (5): 491-496.

    BackgroundOur aim in this study was to compare the blood gas changes, the malondialdehyde (MDA) and endogenous antioxidant glutathione (GSH) levels in blood and lung tissues after ischemia/reperfusion, the histopathological damage in lung tissue in rats provided respiratory support with mechanical ventilation after translaryngeal intubation and tracheostomy.MethodsGroup 1 rats were provided mechanical ventilator support after translaryngeal intubation, Group 2 mechanical ventilator support after tracheostomy, and Group 3 was the control group where rats were only anesthetized. Three groups were compared for blood gas changes, MDA, GSH, and histopathological changes.ResultsBlood gas evaluation showed a more marked increase in pO2 values and decline in pCO2 values in Group 2 than Group 1 (p<0.05), and higher serum MDA levels in Group 1 than Group 2 (p<0.05). Tissue GSH levels in Groups 1 and 2 were higher than the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). In terms of histopathological scoring, the damage score in Group 1 was higher than in Group 2 (p<0.05).ConclusionThis is the first study to show tracheostomy to be more advantageous than translaryngeal intubation in terms of blood gases, ischemia/reperfusion damage, and structural changes in the lung tissue.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…