• Ioulietta Lazarou, Katerina Adam, Kostas Georgiadis, Anthoula Tsolaki, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Ioannis Yiannis Kompatsiaris, and Magda Tsolaki.
• Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
• J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018 Jan 1; 65 (2): 543-575.

BackgroundStudies on subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) and neural activation report controversial results.ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability to disentangle the differences of visual N170 ERP, generated by facial stimuli (Anger & Fear) as well as the cognitive deterioration of SCI, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to healthy controls (HC).Method57 people took part in this study. Images corresponding to facial stimuli of "Anger" and "Fear" were presented to 12 HC, 14 SCI, 17 MCI and 14 AD participants. EEG data were recorded by using a HD-EEG HydroCel with 256 channels.ResultsResults showed that the amplitude of N170 can contribute in distinguishing the SCI group, since statistically significant differences were observed with the HC (p < 0.05) and the MCI group from HC (p < 0.001), as well as AD from HC (p = 0.05) during the processing of facial stimuli. Noticeable differences were also observed in the topographic distribution of the N170 amplitude, while localization analysis by using sLORETA images confirmed the activation of superior, middle-temporal, and frontal lobe brain regions. Finally, in the case of "Fear", SCI and HC demonstrated increased activation in the orbital and inferior frontal gyrus, respectively, MCI in the inferior temporal gyrus, and AD in the lingual gyrus.ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that the amplitude of N170 elicited after negative facial stimuli could be modulated by the decline related to pathological cognitive aging and can contribute in distinguishing HC from SCI, MCI, and AD.

36 keywords...

hide…