• Rehan Ramzan Khan, Saima Riaz, Sajid Rashid, and Muhammad Sulman.
• Dr. Rehan Ramzan Khan, MSPT-OMPT. Assistant Professor, Multan College of Physiotherapy, Multan Medical and Dental College (MMDC), Multan, Pakistan.
• Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep 1; 37 (5): 1451-1455.

ObjectivesTo determine the effectiveness of mechanical traction in supine versus prone lying position for lumbosacral radiculopathy.MethodsA quasi experimental trial was conducted from April to September 2020 among sixty patients of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy at Ibn e Siena Hospital, Multan. Participants were divided into two groups. Group-A (Supine) participants received lumbar traction in supine lying along with conventional treatment. Group-B (Prone) underwent the same treatment except the lumbar traction being applied in prone lying position. Participants were evaluated twice: at pre- treatment (week 0) and at the post treatment (week 2). Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale were used as outcome measure. Data was analyzed on SPSS 23.ResultsThe mean (±S.D) age of the patients was 39±5.7 vs. 40±5.3 years in supine vs. prone group respectively. Mean ODI score was 25.2±6.13 vs. 26.0±6.26 at the start of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively while it was 19.45±7.12 vs. 11.05±4.40 at end of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively. Mean NPRS score was 7.73±1.23 vs. 7.67±0.96 at start of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively while it was 4.63±0.89 vs. 3.13±0.90 at the end of treatment in supine vs. prone position respectively.ConclusionLumbar traction in prone lying position is more effective than lumbar traction in supine lying position for the treatment of chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy.Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.

3 keywords...

hide…