• V Chaudhry and L L Clawson.
• Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 1997 Jan 1; 62 (1): 71-6.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether "diseased nerves" are more prone to entrapment neuropathy than normal nerves. Nerve conduction studies of human neuropathies have shown that electrophysiological abnormalities are often most prominent at potential sites of nerve entrapment, and entrapments are more common in patients with radiculopathies--a concept designated as "double crush". As entrapment neuropathies commonly occur in otherwise healthy subjects, it is unclear whether this relation is coincidental or whether peripheral nerves affected by disease are rendered more susceptible to effects of repeated minor trauma, traction, or mechanical compression.MethodsSequential ulnar nerve conduction studies were prospectively performed at baseline and at four, eight, and 12 month intervals in 16 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ulnar nerve entrapment was defined as a focal reduction (> 10 m/s) in conduction velocity in the across-elbow segment.ResultsUlnar sensory and motor nerve fibres showed similar findings of ulnar nerve entrapment at baseline and at follow up over the period of the study. Nerves with ulnar nerve entrapment showed a significantly greater reduction in distal motor amplitudes than nerves without entrapment, even though distal ulnar sensory amplitudes remained unchanged.ConclusionsMotor nerves in motor neuron disease do not seem to be more susceptible to entrapment at the elbow than do healthy sensory nerves, thus casting doubt on the double crush hypothesis. Nerves with double pathology (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and ulnar nerve entrapment), however, seem to undergo more rapid axonal loss than do nerves with single pathology (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ulnar nerve entrapment alone).

17 keywords...

hide…