• Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Melissa Spears, Chris Boustred, Margaret May, Simon G Anderson, Emelia J Benjamin, Pierre Boutouyrie, James Cameron, Chen-Huan Chen, J Kennedy Cruickshank, Shih-Jen Hwang, Edward G Lakatta, Stephane Laurent, João Maldonado, Gary F Mitchell, Samer S Najjar, Anne B Newman, Mitsuru Ohishi, Bruno Pannier, Telmo Pereira, Ramachandran S Vasan, Tomoki Shokawa, Kim Sutton-Tyrell, Francis Verbeke, Kang-Ling Wang, David J Webb, Willum HansenTineTResearch Center for Prevention and Health, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup and Steno Diabetes Center, Glostrup, Denmark., Sophia Zoungas, Carmel M McEniery, John R Cockcroft, and Ian B Wilkinson.
• School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: y.ben-shlomo@bristol.ac.uk.
• J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014 Feb 25; 63 (7): 636-646.

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to determine whether aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) improves prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events beyond conventional risk factors.BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that aPWV may be a useful risk factor for predicting CVD, but they have been underpowered to examine whether this is true for different subgroups.MethodsWe undertook a systematic review and obtained individual participant data from 16 studies. Study-specific associations of aPWV with CVD outcomes were determined using Cox proportional hazard models and random effect models to estimate pooled effects.ResultsOf 17,635 participants, a total of 1,785 (10%) had a CVD event. The pooled age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) per 1-SD change in loge aPWV were 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 1.50; p < 0.001) for coronary heart disease, 1.54 (95% CI: 1.34 to 1.78; p < 0.001) for stroke, and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.30 to 1.61; p < 0.001) for CVD. Associations stratified according to sex, diabetes, and hypertension were similar but decreased with age (1.89, 1.77, 1.36, and 1.23 for age ≤50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and >70 years, respectively; pinteraction <0.001). After adjusting for conventional risk factors, aPWV remained a predictor of coronary heart disease (HR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.11 to 1.35]; p < 0.001), stroke (HR: 1.28 [95% CI: 1.16 to 1.42]; p < 0.001), and CVD events (HR: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.18 to 1.43]; p < 0.001). Reclassification indices showed that the addition of aPWV improved risk prediction (13% for 10-year CVD risk for intermediate risk) for some subgroups.ConclusionsConsideration of aPWV improves model fit and reclassifies risk for future CVD events in models that include standard risk factors. aPWV may enable better identification of high-risk populations that might benefit from more aggressive CVD risk factor management.Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…